RESEARCH RESULTS : A PROFILE OF DIASPORA PHILANTHROPY IN THE CORDILLERA REGION
Posted on: May 27, 2012
- In: abra | culture | diaspora philantrophy | education | Historical places | igorot | Igorot culture | igorots | maeng | mother tongue | philian weygan | tourist destination
- Leave a Comment
THE PROFILE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIASPORA PHILANTHROPY IN THE CORDILLERA
By Philian Louise Weygan Allan
February, 2012
Summary of the research for Oral Presentation
A. As to problem statement, conclusions and recommendations
| Problem Statement
(Pages 72-73) |
Conclusion
(Pages 174-183) |
Recommendations (Pages 184-194) |
| 1) What is the profile of Diaspora philanthropy/giving with respect to
1.1 Donors/Givers and 1.2 Recipients? |
1.a Donors
There are substantial evidence of a Cordillera region Diaspora Philanthropy. 1.b Recipients All of the provinces in CAR are recipients of Diaspora philanthropy. |
1.a Recommendation 1
A staff organization is recommended to further study the recipients and donors.
1.c Recommendation 5 A study on the recipients and donors should further be made to give an idea on the matching of needs and donations. |
| 2 ) What facilitate the Diaspora Giving in terms of the following factors
2.1 Cultural, 2.2 Socio-economic and 2.3 Political? |
2.a
Cordillera Diaspora Philanthropy is generally motivated by cultural and traditional heritage. 2.b Diaspora philanthropy greatly responds to Socio Economic needs including education, medical and relief. |
2.a
Recommendation 1. A staff organization is recommended to further study the factors.
|
| 3) What management process is practiced/implemented in Diaspora giving/philanthropy regarding
3.1 Objective setting, 3.2 Profiling of recipients, 3.3 Methods of implementation, 2.4 Indicators of success and 3.5 Monitoring and Evaluation procedures? |
3.a There is a lack of documentation on the donors and recipients of Diaspora philanthropy.
3.b There are management patterns that govern the Diaspora philanthropy. 3.c The project management processes are wanting in some areas. 3.d Leadership is assumed and the structures are formed through consensus among members of Cordillera Diaspora philanthropic organizations although they remain voluntary and flexible. |
Recommendation 1.
A staff organization is recommended to further study management processes. 3.b Recommendation 2. The project development and management process of Diaspora giving needs to be improved. 3.c Recommendation 4 A focused study be conducted to assess the impact of the various Diaspora philanthropy in the region specially those received by government and non-government agencies 3.d. Recommendation 5 A study on the recipients and donors should further be made to give an idea on the matching of needs and donations. 3.e. Recommendation 6 Case studies can be conducted to focus on best practices of managing Diaspora giving/philanthropy |
b.SUMMARY AS TO RESEARCH FINDINGS
| Problem Statement
(Pages 72-73) |
Research Data |
| 1) What is the profile of Diaspora philanthropy/giving with respect to
1.1 Donors/Givers and 1.2 Recipients? |
Table 2 – Table on Frequency as to location of Donors
Table 3 showing the years the organizations were started Table 5 – Organizational Purpose And Location Table 10 Profile of Recipients as to location, kind of Assistance and Donor Table 11 Summary of Recipients as to project purpose per donor Table 13-Recipients as to individuals/families and institutions Table 14 No of recipients as to municipalities, Provinces and cities of the Cordillera Region
|
| 2 ) What facilitate the Diaspora Giving in terms of the following factors
2.1 Cultural, 2.2 Socio-economic and 2.3 Political? |
Table 10 -Profile of Recipients as to location, kind of Assistance and Donor
Table 11 Summary of Recipients as to project purpose per donor |
| 3) What management process is practiced/implemented in Diaspora giving/philanthropy regarding
3.1 Objective setting, 3.2 Profiling of recipients, 3.3 Methods of implementation, 2.4 Indicators of success and 3.5 Monitoring and Evaluation procedures? |
Table 11 Summary of Recipients as to project purpose per donor
Table 12 Summary as to aid to government and non government institution/recipients Table 13-Recipients as to individuals/families and institutions Table 15 –Givers’ response to Impact of programs and project Table 16- Givers’ Perception as to the presence of the Project Management Process
|
Philouise's Weblog 
Leave a comment